Thanks @lizbarry, love the discussion! 
I just wanna underscore that - based on discussions I’ve been a part of - a key underlying issue with GOSH governance so far is that who “counts” as a “community member” and exactly what the “GOSH community” is are not well defined. This is IMO a foundational issue that affects all other governance considerations. Over the past year, one manifestation of this lack of clear definition is the concern over how GOSH - through the Community Council - is administering the money we received and give to the regional funding and collaborative development funding.
Of course, some groups simply institute a formal membership process. But is this what “we” want? And are there other ways to defining our community and who are in it?
Let’s keep talking in this thread about this and the other things!